California has always been a tough place to protect wealth. It’s one of the most creditor-friendly states in the country, with judges who see right through creative paperwork and statutes written to make sure they can.

And nowhere is that more obvious than with self-settled spendthrift trusts—the kind of trust where you try to make yourself both the creator and the beneficiary.

On paper, they sound brilliant: you put your assets into a trust, name yourself as a beneficiary, and add a “spendthrift clause” that supposedly keeps creditors out.

In reality, if you live in California, that protection disappears the moment someone files a lawsuit.

⸻

Why Self-Settled Trusts Don’t Work Here

California law makes the rule brutally clear.

Under Probate Code §15304(a), a spendthrift clause in a self-settled trust is unenforceable against your creditors.

In plain English: if you can take money out of your own trust, your creditors can too.

That isn’t just theory—it’s been tested.

In In re Bogetti (9th Cir. BAP 2023), the court reaffirmed that any restraint on transfer inside a self-settled trust is void when creditors come knocking. The trust itself still exists, but it’s an open door for judgment holders.

Lawmakers reinforced that stance with AB 1866 in 2023. The bill added subsection (c) to §15304, allowing a trustee to reimburse the settlor for income-tax payments on trust income without giving creditors extra rights.

It’s a narrow tax fix, not an asset-protection loophole. The overall message stayed the same: California does not allow self-settled asset-protection trusts.

⸻

How the Courts Treat Control

California judges don’t get distracted by legal language—they look at control.

If you keep control, you keep liability.

That idea dates all the way back to Sheean v. Michel (1936), where the state’s Supreme Court ignored a father’s “trust for his children” because he still ran the show.

Modern courts apply the same logic. When you hold the strings, the law treats the assets as yours.

Even when the trust looks discretionary, courts can reach into it. §15304(b) lets creditors claim anything the trustee could distribute to you, capped at what you contributed.

And if the trust is revocable—like the living trusts most estate planners use—§18200 makes everything inside fully reachable while you’re alive.

Why Out-of-State Trusts Don’t Save You

A lot of Californians hear about Nevada or Wyoming Asset Protection Trusts and assume they can dodge the problem by going out of state.

That strategy dies fast once it hits a California courtroom.

In Kilker v. Stillman (2012), a California resident tried exactly that with a Nevada trust. The court struck it down, holding that California’s public policy overrides Nevada’s more favorable statutes.

The same pattern repeated in In re Huber (2013) and Dahl v. Dahl (2015). Different states, same result. If you live in California, California law follows you.

⸻

The LLC Myth

Some people pivot from trusts to LLCs, thinking they’ve found a loophole.

LLCs are good business tools, but they’re not full protection either.

Under Corporations Code §17705.03, a creditor can get a charging order on your membership interest, intercepting distributions.

If you own a single-member LLC, things get worse—courts can appoint a receiver or even force a foreclosure sale.

And if you treat the LLC like your personal bank account, you risk reverse veil-piercing.

The landmark case Curci Investments v. Baldwin (2017) allowed it when a debtor used an LLC to dodge judgments. No appellate court has limited that ruling since.

⸻

Transfers Under the Microscope

Even moving assets into a trust after trouble starts can create bigger problems.

California’s Uniform Voidable Transactions Act (Civil Code §3439.01 et seq.) lets courts unwind transfers made:

• with actual intent to hinder or delay creditors (§3439.04(a)(1)), or

• without reasonably equivalent value when you’re insolvent (§3439.04(a)(2), §3439.05).

Courts apply an eleven-factor “badges of fraud” test to decide intent, and they use it aggressively.

The Bigger Picture: Why Timing Matters

California’s lawsuit environment is only getting worse.

According to the Judicial Council, 2023–24 saw roughly one civil filing for every 26 residents in L.A. County and one for every 35 in Orange County.

Average medical-malpractice payouts hit about $218,000, and new legislation (SB 71) just raised the small-claims limit to $12,500—inviting even more litigation.

That means the question isn’t if you’ll face risk, but when.

⸻

What Actually Works

1. Pure Offshore Trusts

Jurisdictions like the Cook Islands and Nevis have laws built for asset protection. They don’t recognize U.S. judgments, have a one-year statute of limitations on fraudulent-transfer claims, and require creditors to prove intent beyond a reasonable doubt.

They work—but they’re complex and expensive to set up.

2. The Bridge Trust® Hybrid

The Bridge Trust® gives Californians offshore strength with domestic simplicity.

It starts as a U.S. grantor trust under IRC §§ 671–677, fully IRS-compliant and reportable.

While there’s no legal threat, it behaves like a domestic trust. If a claim arises, it can legally transition offshore to the Cook Islands, where U.S. judgments mean nothing.

That shift isn’t automatic—it happens under the supervision of your attorney and trust protector.

You stay compliant, transparent, and in control—until you need the firewall.

The Takeaway

California has shut the door on self-settled asset-protection trusts.

Between Probate Code §15304, In re Bogetti (2023), and Kilker v. Stillman (2012), the law is clear: if you can benefit from your own trust, your creditors can too.

If you’re serious about protecting wealth here, the solution isn’t paperwork—it’s jurisdiction.

Use a structure that the state can’t dismantle: a properly timed Bridge Trust® or a fully offshore trust built before any lawsuit appears.

You don’t wait for the fire to buy insurance. The same rule applies to asset protection.

Protect what you’ve built—before California’s legal system decides to do it for you.

🔗 Learn more or schedule a private strategy call at (888) 773-9399.

By: Brian T. Bradley, Esq.