What United States v. Huckaby Actually Teaches About Asset Protection

United States v. Huckaby (2026): What the Case Actually Held. United States v. Huckaby, No. 2:23-cv-00587-DAD-JDP (E.D. Cal. Mar. 2, 2026), is a federal collection case in which a self-settled Nevada spendthrift trust failed to protect California real property from a federal judgment lien under 28 U.S.C. §3201(a). The court applied California law to the creditor question — not Nevada’s — because the property sits in California. Under California law the trust was void as a self-settled shield, because the same people were its settlors, trustees, and beneficiaries.

Continue ReadingWhat United States v. Huckaby Actually Teaches About Asset Protection

Ultimate Guide: Offshore Asset Protection Trusts: Domestic, Offshore, and the Hybrid That Changes Everything

Domestic trusts fail in creditor-friendly states. Fully offshore trusts are expensive and complex. The hybrid Bridge Trust was designed to solve both problems — here’s how all three structures compare under real enforcement pressure.

Continue ReadingUltimate Guide: Offshore Asset Protection Trusts: Domestic, Offshore, and the Hybrid That Changes Everything